Litter Cover
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context.
Evidence & Context
A defensible benchmark for the best available condition of Litter Cover (%) in a production forestry context within this biome is therefore a range of 50% to 70%.
Litter Cover (%)
This benchmark defines the optimal range of litter cover percentage for sustainably managed production forestry in the Temperate Semi-Arid Shrublands & Open Woodlands biome, balancing ecological potential and operational realities.
The benchmark represents a dynamic range for a best-practice, sustainably managed production forest. The upper value of 70% is derived from the NSW Government's empirically-based benchmark for high-integrity 'Semi-arid woodlands (Shrubby subformation)', representing the ecological potential in mature, healthy patches. The range of 50-70% reflects an actively managed landscape mosaic that balances this ecological potential with operational realities.
Sources (1)
Function Attribute Benchmarks for the Biodiversity Assessment Method: Data audit, compilation and analysis - Environment and Heritage, accessed May 19, 2025
View SourceSupporting Sources (20)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
A Review of Forest Management Effects on Terrestrial Leaf Litter Inhabiting Arthropods, accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourceAustralia's fuel management and wildfire policy - SERC (Carleton), accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourceCriteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Victoria, accessed March 28, 2026,
View SourceIN PRAISE OF GROUNDCOVER - Australian Rangeland Society -
View SourceSustainable forest management: the Australian context - DAFF, accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourceForest Management Plan frequently asked questions | Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, accessed August 9, 2025,
View SourceRelease of the 5-year Review of the Biodiversity Assessment Method, accessed August 11, 2025,
View SourceDoes the NSW vegetation integrity assessment underestimate the conservation values of derived native grasslands? - Western Sydney University, accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourceProcesses underpinning natural capital account compilation highlight the potential for low-input grazing to mitigate farm carbon emissions while also improving biodiversity outcomes - CSIRO Publishing, accessed May 19, 2025
View SourceThe Distribution and Abundance of Leaf Litter Arthropods in MOFEP Sites 1, 2, and 3, accessed July 13, 2025
View SourceModelling litter accumulation and fire risks in Australia using Olson models: Commentary on Adams and Neumann (2024) - ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourceNRM top tips - July: Protect litter and groundcover to reduce erosion and weeds, and provide habitat | CottonInfo, accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourcePOLICY - ForestrySA, accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourceTop 6 Sustainable Forest Management Techniques, accessed July 12, 2025,
View Source(PDF) The effect of plant litter on ecosystem properties in a ..., accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourceThe effects of clipping frequency and nitrogen fertilisation on greenhouse gas emissions and net ecosystem exchange in an Australian temperate grassland - CSIRO PUBLISHING | The Rangeland Journal
View SourceMaintaining groundcover to reduce erosion and sustain production - NSW Department of Primary Industries
View SourceThe role of decomposer communities in managing surface fuels: a neglected ecosystem service - CSIRO Publishing, accessed July 12, 2025,
View SourceSustaining forest soil quality and productivity [Chapter 3], accessed July 19, 2025,
View SourceAustralia's Sustainable Forest Management - DAFF, accessed July 12, 2025,
View Source