eDNA Biodiversity Detection
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Evidence & Context
An eDNA profile corresponding to a 'Poor' (Grade D) waterway health rating, marked by the absence of sensitive taxa and dominance by a few tolerant species.
An eDNA biodiversity profile characteristic of a waterway with 'Poor' (Grade D) ecological condition, showing absence of sensitive taxa and dominance by tolerant species.
Lower critical threshold where ecosystem function is compromised due to loss of sensitive taxa.
Defined by the HR2RP Grade D waterway health rating and supported by ecological principles linking biodiversity loss to ecosystem function impairment.
Sources (1)
Categories - environmental DNA - CSIRO Data Access Portal
View SourceSupporting Sources (8)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
Eutrophication (nutrient enrichment) - Government of Western Australia
View SourceMemorandum - Nitrate guideline values in ANZECC 2000
View SourceFunctional Agro-Biodiversity: An Evaluation of Current Approaches and Outcomes - MDPI
View SourceMackay Whitsunday Water Quality Improvement Plan 2014-2021 - Reef Catchments
View SourceMackay Whitsunday Water Quality Improvement Plan 2014-2021 - Reef Catchments, accessed August 2, 2025
View SourceeDNA as a tool to inform aquatic biosecurity management decisions: A case study on a South-East Queensland dam with a retrofitted fish passage facility
View SourcePlant Production and Protection Division: How to manage agricultural biodiversity
View SourcePlant Production and Protection Division: How to manage agricultural biodiversity
View Source