eDNA Biodiversity Detection
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is Point, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Evidence & Context
Proxy data from a large-scale survey of the managed Murray-Darling Basin detected 144 vertebrate species.
Number of vertebrate species detected via eDNA metabarcoding
This benchmark represents the number of vertebrate species detected using eDNA metabarcoding as a proxy reference for biodiversity in managed agricultural landscapes, given the absence of direct data for tropical rainforest grazing areas.
A direct benchmark for best-practice grazing in Australian tropical rainforests is not available in scientific literature. This value is a proxy from a large-scale study in a different (temperate/arid) but heavily agricultural Australian landscape.
Sources (1)
Murray–Darling Basin Authority. (2024). eDNA results reveal rich biodiversity in the Murray–Darling Basin. Joint Media Release.
View SourceSupporting Sources (4)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
Biodiversity conservation and vegetation clearing in Queensland: Principles and thresholds | Request PDF - ResearchGate
View SourceBiodiversity Planning Assessment - Wet Tropics Bioregion Expert Panel Report, Version 1.1 - Queensland Government
View SourceEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
View SourceThe Impacts of Land Use Change on Biodiversity in ...
View Source