Bare Ground

Benchmark Value

28 %

Direction: Lower is desirable ↓

Form: Point

Scoring Curve

Scoring curve unavailable

The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is Point, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.

Evidence & Context

"For the burnt plots, bare ground ranged from 0% to 80%, with a mean of 28%"

Metric Definition:

Percentage of bare ground in surveyed plots

Benchmark Definition:

This benchmark represents the typical percentage of bare ground observed in burnt plots within post-fire subalpine shrubland, indicating the state of ground cover after fire disturbance.

Justification:

Represents high-health state after natural disturbance

Sources (1)

Foulkes, J., & Corkrey, R. (2021). Assessing the post-fire recovery of alpine shrublands: A study in the Tasmanian Highlands. Fire, 4(3), 32. Journal

Foulkes, J., & Corkrey, R. (2021). Assessing the post-fire recovery of alpine shrublands: A study in the Tasmanian Highlands. Fire, 4(3), 32.

View Source

Supporting Sources (8)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

ABARES (2025). Indicator 4.1b: Management of the risk of soil erosion in forests. Australia's State of the Forests Report.

Contextual Support Government

ABARES (2023). Indicator 5.1a: Contribution of forest ecosystems to the global carbon cycle. Australia's State of the Forests Report.

View Source

Cunningham, S. C., & Walsh, N. G. (2004). Treeless subalpine vegetation of the Kosciuszko region. Cunninghamia, 8(4), 439-452.

Direct Evidence Regulatory Framework Government

Cunningham, S. C., & Walsh, N. G. (2004). Treeless subalpine vegetation of the Kosciuszko region. Cunninghamia, 8(4), 439-452.

View Source

Preview of Long-term Vegetation Change in Relation to Cattle Grazing in Subalpine Grassland and Heathland on the Bogong High Plains - DCCEEW, accessed on May 25, 2025,

Long-term Vegetation Change in Relation to Cattle Grazing in Subalpine Grassland and Heathland on the Bogong High Plains - DCCEEW, accessed on May 25, 2025,

Contextual Support Journal

Wood, S. W., et al. (2015). The Ausplots Forest Monitoring Network: Tall eucalypt forests. PLOS ONE.

View Source

Private Forests Tasmania (2021). Management of Natural regeneration in eucalypt plantations.

Direct Evidence Journal

Private Forests Tasmania (2021). Management of Natural regeneration in eucalypt plantations.

View Source

Private Native Forestry Code of Practice for Southern NSW - FAOLEX, accessed May 15, 2025

Direct Evidence Journal

Forestry Corporation of NSW (2022). Private Native Forestry Code of Practice for Southern New South Wales.

View Source

Preview of Schedule-1-Management-Standards-and-Procedures-for-timber-harvesting-operations-in-Victorias-State-forests.pdf, accessed March 28, 2026,

Schedule-1-Management-Standards-and-Procedures-for-timber-harvesting-operations-in-Victorias-State-forests.pdf, accessed March 28, 2026,

Contextual Support Journal

Wahren, C. H., Papst, W. A., & Williams, R. J. (1999). Long-term vegetation change in the Bogong High Plains, Victoria.

View Source

Soil erosion hazard, accessed July 20, 2025,

Direct Evidence Journal

Forest Practices Authority Tasmania (2010). Technical Bulletin 2: Eucalyptus delegatensis forests.

View Source

Technical Bulletin 2: Eucalyptus delegatensis forests

Direct Evidence Journal

New South Wales Government. (2022). Private Native Forestry Code of Practice for Southern NSW.

View Source

Benchmark Value

Scoring Curve

Evidence & Context

Sources (1)

Supporting Sources (8)

Context

Lifecycle

Notes

Related Benchmarks