Water Turbidity
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 20 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 19 guard(s) constrain the result.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
A general water quality guide suggests that turbidity above 36 NTU is "too murky" for a healthy aquatic environment.
Water turbidity measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) indicating the threshold above which water is considered too murky for healthy aquatic environments.
Threshold turbidity level above which aquatic ecosystem health is impaired.
This threshold is based on general water quality guidelines indicating detrimental effects above this turbidity level.
Sources (1)
Assessing water quality - ACT Waterwatch
View SourceSupporting Sources (26)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
(PDF) Community uses and values of water informing water quality improvement planning: a study from the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia - ResearchGate, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceEffect of different total suspended solids levels on a Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) BFT culture system during biofloc formation | Request PDF - ResearchGate, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceNSW Marine Waters Sustainable Aquaculture Strategy, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceUsing the ANZECC Guidelines and Water Quality Objectives in NSW, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceEffects of suspended solids in shrimp biofloc systems - Responsible Seafood Advocate, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceBarramundi - NSW Department of Primary Industries, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourcePolygenic discrimination of migratory phenotypes in an estuarine, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceEnvironmental Impacts of Shrimp Aquaculture and Integrated Multi-trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) as a Solution - UMass Amherst, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceBiofloc Technology: A Simple, Green Way to Farm Fish and Shrimp, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceNational Guidelines for Water Quality - Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceDaintree and Mossman River Basins Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives - Queensland Environment Department, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceDaintree catchment water quality targets, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceANZECC (2000) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality.
View SourceFAO-Lates calcarifer Bloch - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceHOW TURBIDITY AFFECTS FISH BEHAVIOUR - Active Angling New Zealand, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceNSW Land Based Sustainable Aquaculture Strategy, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceManagement - WaterNSW, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceMarine Monitoring Program - Inshore water quality monitoring (AIMS) - eAtlas, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceModeling Environmental Impacts of Intensive Shrimp Aquaculture: A Three-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Ecosystem Approach - MDPI, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceMonitoring water quality | AIMS - The Australian Institute of Marine Science, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceQueensland Aquaculture Strategy 2024–2034, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceOPTIMUM CONDITION OF WATER FOR AQUACULTURE | Agriallis, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceAustralian prawn farming manual Part 4-9.pdf, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceWater quality | AIMS - The Australian Institute of Marine Science, accessed July 21, 2025,
View SourceAustralian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000)
View SourceContext dependency of top-down and bottom-up effects in a Northern Australian tropical river | Freshwater Science: Vol 34, No 2 - The University of Chicago Press: Journals, accessed July 21, 2025,
View Source