Water Turbidity
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 13 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 12 guard(s) constrain the result.
Evidence & Context
The optimal range for maintaining high ecological health is < 10 NTU to 25 NTU.
Water turbidity measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU), indicating water clarity and ecological health.
This benchmark defines the optimal turbidity range for maintaining high ecological health in urban semi-arid streams, from near zero to 25 NTU.
Based on the best-on-offer benchmark and the upper detrimental threshold, the optimal range is defined to maintain high ecological health.
Sources (1)
Assessing water quality - ACT Waterwatch.
View SourceSupporting Sources (37)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
NVIS Fact sheet MVG 19 – Tussock grasslands, accessed July 13, 2025
View Sourceact practice guidelines for water sensitive urban design - Planning, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceAmbient Water Quality Monitoring of South Australia's Rivers and Streams - EPA SA, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceAppendix 13 – Water Reports - NET, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceNorthern Territory Government (2020) Darwin Harbour Region Water Quality Objectives, Report Card Section 3.0.
View SourceBayswater Brook Catchment - City of Bayswater, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceBrownhill Creek, Brownhill Creek Road 2016 Aquatic Ecosystem Condition Report | EPA, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceBrownhill Creek, Brownhill Creek Road 2016 Aquatic Ecosystem Condition Report | EPA
View SourceCatchment to Coast (metropolitan Adelaide) | EPA, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceTurbidity | Australia state of the environment 2021
View SourceMardie Project – Marine Water Quality Baseline - EPA WA
View SourceDraft environmental values and water quality guidelines: Burdekin Basin fresh and estuarine waters - Queensland Environment Department, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceManaging urban water - Department for Environment and Water, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceMardie Project – Marine Water Quality Baseline - EPA WA, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceUsing the ANZECC Guidelines and Water Quality Objectives in NSW
View SourceDatabase - Resilience Alliance, accessed July 30, 2025,
View SourceOnkaparinga River, downstream from Mount Bold Reservoir 2011 Aquatic Ecosystem Condition Report - EPA SA, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceOnkaparinga River, Woodside 2011 Aquatic Ecosystem Condition Report | EPA, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourcePlanning requirements for Water Sensitive Urban Design | City of Melbourne, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceProtecting drinking water quality into the future —priority areas and land use compatibility in Adelaide's Mount Lofty Ranges Watershed - epa.sa.gov.a, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceSemi-arid woodlands (grassy sub-formation) | NSW Environment, Energy and Science
View SourceCharacterising the relationship between water quality and water quantity, accessed July 21, 2025
View SourceStreams in the Urban Landscape - Sarasota County Water Atlas, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceTurbidity | Australian Drinking Water Guidelines - NHMRC, accessed August 3, 2025
View SourceKosciuszko National Park's health a mixed diagnosis in first EcoHealth Scorecard
View SourceDissolved Oxygen (DO) Turbidity - Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, accessed July 12, 2025
View SourceUrban Stormwater in Perth: Strengths Weaknesses and Recommendations for Future Management - Parliament of Western Australia, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceUrban Streams Monitoring Program - City of Bellingham, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceAssessing Water Quality - Secondary Education Years 9 to 12 - Upper Murrumbidgee Waterwatch, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourcePositive responses of benthic macroinvertebrates to spatial and temporal reductions in water pollution downstream from a trout farm outlet | Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, accessed August 17, 2025
View SourceWater sensitive urban design - Department for Environment and Water, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceWater Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD), accessed July 13, 2025
View SourceWater sensitive urban design brochures - Western Australian Government, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceWater sensitive urban design guideline June 2023 - Transport for NSW, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceSection 13 – Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) Guidelines - City of Gold Coast, accessed July 13, 2025
View SourceWater Sensitive Urban Design Solutions for Catchments above Wetlands - Hunter Joint Organisation, accessed July 13, 2025,
View SourceWestern Mount Lofty Ranges Prescribed Water Resources Area 2020–21 water resources assessment - WaterConnect, accessed July 13, 2025,
View Source