Litter Cover

AUS-ASC-LVG-LIT General High confidence

Benchmark Value

70 %
Direction: Higher is desirable ↑
Form: MinimumOnly

Scoring Curve

Scoring curve unavailable

The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.

Evidence & Context

Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA) guidelines recommend a minimum of 70% total groundcover for pastures on flat to slightly sloping land.

Metric Definition:

Minimum total groundcover (%) recommended for pasture sustainability on flat to slightly sloping land.

Benchmark Definition:

Recommended minimum total groundcover percentage for pasture sustainability on flat to slightly sloping land, implying substantial litter component.

Justification:

Recommendation from MLA guidelines linking total groundcover to pasture health and erosion control.

Sources (1)

Preview of Rehabilitation Field Guide | Australian Alps National Parks, accessed on May 25, 2025,
Rehabilitation Field Guide | Australian Alps National Parks, accessed on May 25, 2025, Journal

A strategy for dealing with invasive species in Australia

View Source

Supporting Sources (10)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of (PDF) Livestock grazing management and biodiversity conservation in Australian temperate grassy landscapes - ResearchGate, accessed May 11, 2025
(PDF) Livestock grazing management and biodiversity conservation in Australian temperate grassy landscapes - ResearchGate, accessed May 11, 2025
Contextual Support GreyLiterature

section 2 water quality in the darwin region - Environment and Natural Resources

View Source
Preview of A review of indicators and methods to assess biodiversity - FAO Knowledge Repository
A review of indicators and methods to assess biodiversity - FAO Knowledge Repository
Contextual Support Journal

Comparison of grazed and cleared temperate grassy woodlands in eastern Australia: patterns in space and inferences in time - ResearchGate, accessed August 6, 2025

View Source
Preview of Bryant, W. G. (1971). The effect of grazing and burning on a mountain grassland, Snowy Mountains, New South Wales. Journal of the Soil Conservation Service of NSW, 27(4), 211-234.
Bryant, W. G. (1971). The effect of grazing and burning on a mountain grassland, Snowy Mountains, New South Wales. Journal of the Soil Conservation Service of NSW, 27(4), 211-234.
Direct Evidence Journal

Bryant, W. G. (1971). The effect of grazing and burning on a mountain grassland, Snowy Mountains, New South Wales. Journal of the Soil Conservation Service of NSW, 27(4), 211-234.

View Source
Preview of Eldridge, D. J., Poore, A. G., Ruiz-Colmenero, M., Letnic, M., & Soliveres, S. (2016). Ecosystem structure, function, and composition in rangelands are negatively affected by livestock grazing. Ecological Applications, 26(4), 1273-1283.
Eldridge, D. J., Poore, A. G., Ruiz-Colmenero, M., Letnic, M., & Soliveres, S. (2016). Ecosystem structure, function, and composition in rangelands are negatively affected by livestock grazing. Ecological Applications, 26(4), 1273-1283.
Contextual Support Journal

Eldridge, D. J., Poore, A. G., Ruiz-Colmenero, M., Letnic, M., & Soliveres, S. (2016). Ecosystem structure, function, and composition in rangelands are negatively affected by livestock grazing. Ecological Applications, 26(4), 1273-1283.

View Source
Preview of Function Attribute Benchmarks for the Biodiversity Assessment Method: Data audit, compilation and analysis - Environment and Heritage, accessed July 10, 2025,
Function Attribute Benchmarks for the Biodiversity Assessment Method: Data audit, compilation and analysis - Environment and Heritage, accessed July 10, 2025,
Direct Evidence

Victorian State of the Environment report

View Source
Preview of Long-term Vegetation Change in Relation to Cattle Grazing in Subalpine Grassland and Heathland on the Bogong High Plains - DCCEEW, accessed on May 25, 2025,
Long-term Vegetation Change in Relation to Cattle Grazing in Subalpine Grassland and Heathland on the Bogong High Plains - DCCEEW, accessed on May 25, 2025,
Contextual Support Journal

Wood, S. W., et al. (2015). The Ausplots Forest Monitoring Network: Tall eucalypt forests. PLOS ONE.

View Source
Preview of Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA). (2021). Best management practices for temperate perennial pastures in New South Wales.
Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA). (2021). Best management practices for temperate perennial pastures in New South Wales.
Direct Evidence Journal

Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA). (2021). Best management practices for temperate perennial pastures in New South Wales.

View Source
Preview of Meat & Livestock Australia. (n.d.). Maintain ground cover. MLA.
Meat & Livestock Australia. (n.d.). Maintain ground cover. MLA.
Contextual Support GreyLiterature

Best Management Practices for Temperate Perennial Pastures in New South Wales, accessed August 6, 2025

View Source
Preview of Santamarta, J. (2014). Climate Change and Restoration of Degraded Land. ResearchGate.
Santamarta, J. (2014). Climate Change and Restoration of Degraded Land. ResearchGate.
Contextual Support GreyLiterature

Santamarta, J. (2014). Climate Change and Restoration of Degraded Land. ResearchGate.

View Source
Preview of Wimbush, D. J., & Costin, A. B. (1979). Trends in vegetation at Kosciusko. I. Tall alpine herbfield. Australian Journal of Botany, 27(6), 741-787.
Wimbush, D. J., & Costin, A. B. (1979). Trends in vegetation at Kosciusko. I. Tall alpine herbfield. Australian Journal of Botany, 27(6), 741-787.
Contextual Support Journal

Wimbush, D. J., & Costin, A. B. (1979). Trends in vegetation at Kosciusko. I. Tall alpine herbfield. Australian Journal of Botany, 27(6), 741-787.

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Alpine and Subalpine Complex
  • Land Use Livestock Grazing & Pasture
  • Assessment Not Stated
  • Evidence Type DegradationThreshold

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 2
  • Effective From 2 Jun 2026

Notes

This value refers to total groundcover, not specifically litter cover; litter levels are described as 'high' at this total groundcover level. AssessmentContext defaulted to 'Not Stated' because the source document did not state one.