Water Electrical Conductivity (EC)
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 6 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 5 guard(s) constrain the result.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
Chronic exposure to EC values consistently exceeding the natural background range (e.g., >50-100 µS/cm) should be considered a trigger for investigation and concern in high conservation value alpine streams.
Lower limit of electrical conductivity above which ecological concern and investigation is warranted in alpine aquatic ecosystems.
This benchmark indicates the electrical conductivity level above which chronic exposure in alpine streams triggers ecological concern and warrants investigation.
Based on direct evidence from studies showing ecological impacts at EC levels exceeding natural background by significant margins.
Sources (1)
Northern Territory Government (2020) Darwin Harbour Region Water Quality Objectives, Report Card Section 3.0.
View SourceSupporting Sources (3)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
1.5.2.1 Surface water - Bioregional Assessments |
View SourceThe Effects of Road De-icing Salts on Water Quality and Macroinvertebrates in Australian Alpine Streams
View SourceFeral horses (Equus caballus) increase suspended sediment in subalpine streams
View Source