Camera Trap Detection Rate
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Evidence & Context
The following benchmark represents the best available estimate for a high-health agricultural cropping system in Australia's Tropical and Subtropical Rainforests, derived from proxy data.
Camera Trap Detection Rate as detections per 100 trap-nights standardized by survey effort.
This benchmark represents the expected range of camera trap detections per 100 trap-nights for a high-health agricultural cropping system in Australia's Tropical and Subtropical Rainforests, based on proxy data from adjacent savanna woodlands to account for uncertainty and natural variation.
This proxy value is derived from a multi-species mammal survey in adjacent savanna woodlands, which reported an aggregate rate of ~10.0 detections/100 trap-nights. The range of 5-15 is proposed to account for uncertainty and natural variation.
Sources (1)
Camera trapping ekes out some improvement for surveying sparse mammal populations in northern Queensland - ResearchGate
View SourceSupporting Sources (3)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
Feral pigs - WetlandInfo - Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation
View SourceFlying fox conservation laws, policies and practices in Australia - a case study in conserving unpopular species - ResearchGate
View SourceNature-Friendly Agriculture in the State of Queensland, Australia ...
View Source