Camera Trap Detection Rate
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
From Table 4 of Driessen et al. (2022), the "Mean activity (visits/100 camera days)" for "All native mammals" in "Long unburnt" areas surveyed in 2020 on the Central Plateau is 15.5.
Camera Trap Detection Rate (CTR) defined as (number of visits / number of operational camera days) * 100, where a visit is one image or sequence of images with no more than 5 minutes between any two of them and more than 5 minutes until the next image of that species.
This benchmark represents the reference camera trap detection rate for native mammals in long unburnt protected alpine and subalpine areas of the Tasmanian Central Plateau, indicating typical activity levels under conservation management.
The value is derived from 'long unburnt' sites within protected alpine and subalpine landscapes of the Tasmanian Central Plateau, representing the best available condition under current best-practice management, despite the use of fish oil lures which likely inflate detection rates.
Sources (1)
Monitoring Priority Wildlife in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area: Central Plateau - Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania
View SourceSupporting Sources (21)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
2022-2032 Threatened Species Action Plan - DCCEEW
View SourceARI Terrestrial Quarterly Update - Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research
View SourceIdentifying important environmental variables in the niche partitioning of two keystone ecosystem engineers (Bettongia gaimardi and Potorous tridactylus) in Tasmania - CSIRO Publishing
View SourceComparative change in the spatial and temporal dynamics of alpine and subalpine treelines across the Victorian Alps, Australia
View SourcePhase 2 Recovery and Resilience funded projects - DCCEEW
View SourceGaps in Monitoring Leave Northern Australian Mammal Fauna with Uncertain Futures
View SourcePolicy handbook - Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
View SourceARI-Terrestrial-Quarterly-Update-April-2023.docx - Arthur Rylah Institute
View Sourceprogress report of the woylie conservation research project - ResearchGate
View SourceStokeld D., Frank ASK, Hill B., Choy JL, Mahney T., Stevens A., Young S., Rangers D.
View SourceNPWS WildCount Long-term Fauna Monitoring Species Data 2012 ...
View SourceStemming the tide: progress towards resolving the causes of decline and implementing management responses for the disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia
View SourceProject 2: Baselines, drivers and trends for species occupancy and distribution
View SourceProtected Areas: Buffering nature against climate change - PreventionWeb.net, accessed July 22, 2025
View SourceSeasonal and daily activity of non-native sambar deer in and around high-elevation peatlands, south-eastern Australia - BioOne Complete
View SourceBait preference for remote camera trap studies of the endangered northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus) | Request PDF - ResearchGate
View SourceSnap happy: camera traps are an effective sampling tool when compared with alternative methods | Royal Society Open Science - Journals
View SourceTechnical Analysis - Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists
View SourceThe Burramys Project: a conservationist's reach should exceed history's grasp, or what is the fossil record for? - PubMed Central
View SourceWildlife Research - CSIRO PUBLISHING
View Source