Gully Density
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 6 benchmarks together — the Point form drives the primary score, while 5 guard(s) constrain the result.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
Any persistent active gully density > 0 m/ha is detrimental to the ecological health and conservation values of the area.
Gully density is quantitatively defined as "the total gully length per area of the whole study area".
This benchmark sets the upper detrimental threshold for active gully density, where any persistent value above zero harms ecological health and conservation values in the biome.
The severity of the detrimental impact increases with gully density, extent, and connectivity.
Sources (1)
Mokota Conservation Park Management Plan - Department for Environment and Water
View SourceSupporting Sources (14)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
A global comparison of soil erosion associated with land use and climate type
View SourceAustralia's Strategy for the National Reserve System 2009–2030 - DCCEEW
View SourceCan Coarse Woody Debris Be Used for Carbon Storage in Open Grazed Woodlands?
View SourceDeveloping good practice guidance for estimating land degradation in the context of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals | Request PDF - ResearchGate
View SourceEcological site R075XY059NE - Ecosystem Dynamics Interpretive Tool
View SourceInfluence of Topographic Factors on the Characteristics of Gully Systems in Mountainous Areas of Ningnan Dry-Hot Valley, SW China - PubMed Central
View SourceNational Reserve System protected area requirements - DCCEEW
View SourceLetnic, M. (2019). What are native grasslands, and why do they matter? UNSW Newsroom.
View SourceSoil physical properties of the studied gully sidewall (means ± standard error). - ResearchGate
View SourceSydney Drinking Water Catchment Audit 2019-22 - WaterNSW
View SourceThe International Journal of Protected Areas and Conservation
View SourceWoodlands - DCCEEW, accessed May 19, 2025
View Source