Litter Cover
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
The following table presents the final benchmark recommendation in the specified format. Indicator Name Reference Value Unit Source Title Source URL or DOI Confidence Level Short Notes Litter Cover (%) 70–90 % Managing heavy stubble loads without compromising the big things (weeds, disease, pests, timeliness and profit!): a decade of stubble management and farming systems experiments High Benchmark Rationale: The 70–90% range represents the best available condition for agricultural cropping systems in this biome, moving beyond minimum erosion control to a state of high ecological function.
Percentage of soil surface covered by plant litter (post-harvest crop stubble and residues) in agricultural cropping systems.
This benchmark represents the optimal range of litter cover percentage in agricultural cropping systems within the Temperate Grassy Woodlands & Plains biome of Australia, indicating a high ecological function and effective erosion control.
The 70–90% range represents the best available condition for agricultural cropping systems in this biome, moving beyond minimum erosion control to a state of high ecological function. The lower end of this range (70%) is explicitly linked in GRDC best-practice guidance to achieving robust erosion control and water infiltration from 2–3 t/ha of stubble. The lower critical threshold of <50% is based on a strong consensus across multiple state and federal agency guidelines identifying this level as a key inflection point for soil stability.
Sources (1)
Managing heavy stubble loads without compromising the “big things ..., accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceSupporting Sources (18)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
$3.5M national project to examine ways to boost soil organic matter - CSIRO
View SourceEvolution of conservation agriculture in summer rainfall areas, accessed July 27, 2025
View SourceCover crops improve ground cover in a very dry season - GRDC, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceResearch Brief AUS-AKW-AGR-BAR: Bare Ground (%) Benchmark Research for Nature Index
View SourceFarmLink Research Report 2016 - Maintaining profitable farming ..., accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceGlobal Application of Regenerative Agriculture: A Review of Definitions and Assessment Approaches - MDPI, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceMaintaining Profitable Farming Systems with Retained Stubble Across Various Rainfall Environments - Summary of GRDC Stubble Project, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceGRDC Groundcover Article: National blueprint to standardise soil health across Australian agriculture - The Waite, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceManaging stubble | General agronomy | Crop production | Grains, pulses and cereals - Agriculture Victoria, accessed August 13, 2025
View SourceMonitoring groundcover and soil degradation | Erosion - Agriculture Victoria
View SourceMaintaining groundcover to reduce erosion and sustain production - NSW Department of Primary Industries, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceManaging ground cover in the cropping zone of southern NSW, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceRegenerative Agriculture Program restoring soil pH case study: Macdonald, Whites Flat/Koppio
View SourceStubble Retention in Cropping Systems - Gulbali Institute - Charles Sturt University, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceStubble Management Guidelines - Upper North Farming Systems, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceImpacts of retained wheat stubble on canola in southern New South Wales, accessed August 13, 2025
View SourceGround cover monitoring for Australia - DAFF, accessed August 4, 2025,
View SourceGround cover monitoring for Australia - DAFF
View Source