Water Turbidity
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 13 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 12 guard(s) constrain the result.
Evidence & Context
A value of 25 NTU is proposed as this upper threshold.
Upper detrimental threshold for median turbidity indicating ecological harm
Upper detrimental threshold for median turbidity indicating ecological harm in temperate grassy woodlands and plains.
Above this level, significant negative ecological impacts are expected, including reduced light penetration, degradation of benthic habitat, and stress on aquatic fauna.
Sources (1)
ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines - Water Quality Australia
View SourceSupporting Sources (29)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
Sustainable land management practices for graziers - NSW Department of Primary Industries
View SourceAn Examination of Stream Water Quality Data from Monitoring of Forest Harvesting in the Eastern Highlands of Victoria
View SourceAssessing water quality - ACT Waterwatch
View SourceNorthern Territory Government (2020) Darwin Harbour Region Water Quality Objectives, Report Card Section 3.0.
View SourceNational Guidelines for Water Quality | Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania
View SourceReport Card 2022-23 - EPA Victoria
View SourceLivestock grazing management and biodiversity conservation in Australian temperate grassy landscapes - ResearchGate
View SourceRiparian Ecological Restoration Guidelines - Friends of Berowra Valley Inc.
View SourcePasture utilisation
View SourceGrazing Management National Management Measures to Control Nonpoint Pollution from Agriculture - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
View SourceHistorical land-use influences the long-term stream turbidity response to a wildfire - PubMed
View SourceInfluence of a cattle access point on temporal changes in stream turbidity - ScienceOpen
View SourceAssessing translucent environmental water releases in the
View SourceSustainable land management practices for graziers - NSW ...
View SourceImpacts of land management practices on riparian land - DBCA Library
View SourceManaging Riparian Areas - Private Forests Tasmania
View SourceProtecting Water Quality from Agricultural Runoff
View SourceReducing the impacts of grazing on water quality - EPA Victoria
View SourceGeneric document, accessed July 19, 2025,
View SourceRiparian design guidelines to inform the ecological repair of urban waterways - CRC for Water sensitive cities
View SourceThe water quality and economic benefits of agricultural management practices
View SourceProtecting farm waterways | Dairy News Australia
View SourceSURVEY OF LIVESTOCK INFLUENCES ON STREAM AND RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEMS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES - CiteSeerX
View SourceWater Assessment Water Quality Report Series
View SourceWater quality for farm water supplies | Managing dams - Agriculture Victoria
View SourceDevelopment of regional water quality and catchment guidelines for the conservation of aquatic ecosystems - NSW Environment Protection Authority
View SourceWater quality ratings 13 Corangamite CMA - River Detectives
View SourceWater Quality Standards - Turbidity Technical Review - Oregon.gov
View SourceWater supply in stock containment areas | Managing dams - Agriculture Victoria
View Source