Bare Ground

AUS-ASC-FOR-BAR General High confidence

Benchmark Value

70 %
Thresholds: Lower: 30, Upper: —
Direction: Higher is desirable ↑
Form: MinimumOnly

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context.

Evidence & Context

"At least 70% of the ground in areas where regeneration is required should be mechanically exposed or an ashbed."

Metric Definition:

Proportion of ground mechanically exposed or ashbed

Benchmark Definition:

This benchmark defines the minimum proportion of ground that should be mechanically exposed or an ashbed in grassy regeneration sites within alpine and subalpine production forestry to overcome grass competition.

Justification:

Required to overcome grass competition

Sources (1)

Preview of Management of Natural regeneration in eucalypt plantations
Management of Natural regeneration in eucalypt plantations
View Source

Supporting Sources (6)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of Cunningham, S. C., & Walsh, N. G. (2004). Treeless subalpine vegetation of the Kosciuszko region. Cunninghamia, 8(4), 439-452.
Cunningham, S. C., & Walsh, N. G. (2004). Treeless subalpine vegetation of the Kosciuszko region. Cunninghamia, 8(4), 439-452.
Direct Evidence Regulatory Framework Government

Treeless subalpine vegetation of the Kosciuszko region.

View Source
Preview of Foulkes, J., & Corkrey, R. (2021). Assessing the post-fire recovery of alpine shrublands: A study in the Tasmanian Highlands. Fire, 4(3), 32.
Foulkes, J., & Corkrey, R. (2021). Assessing the post-fire recovery of alpine shrublands: A study in the Tasmanian Highlands. Fire, 4(3), 32.
Contextual Support Direct Evidence Journal

Assessing the post-fire recovery of alpine shrublands.

View Source
Preview of Private Forests Tasmania (2021). Management of Natural regeneration in eucalypt plantations.
Private Forests Tasmania (2021). Management of Natural regeneration in eucalypt plantations.
Direct Evidence

Management of Natural regeneration in eucalypt plantations.

View Source
Preview of Private Native Forestry Code of Practice for Southern NSW - FAOLEX, accessed May 15, 2025
Private Native Forestry Code of Practice for Southern NSW - FAOLEX, accessed May 15, 2025
Direct Evidence Journal

Natural Resources Commission (NRC) NSW. (2022). Final report: Private Native Forestry Review.

View Source
Preview of Soil erosion hazard, accessed July 20, 2025,
Soil erosion hazard, accessed July 20, 2025,
Direct Evidence Journal

Forest Practices Authority Tasmania (2010). Technical Bulletin 2: Eucalyptus delegatensis forests.

View Source
Preview of Technical Bulletin 2: Eucalyptus delegatensis forests
Technical Bulletin 2: Eucalyptus delegatensis forests
Direct Evidence Journal

Forestry Tasmania. (2001). Eucalyptus delegatensis Forests. Technical Bulletin No. 2.

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Alpine and Subalpine Complex
  • Land Use Production Forestry
  • Assessment Grassy regeneration sites
  • Evidence Type TargetCondition

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 7 Apr 2026

Notes

Higher is better for regeneration only