Basal Area

AUS-TMS-LVG-BAS General Moderate confidence

Benchmark Value

2.5 m²/ha
Direction: Higher is desirable ↑
Form: MinimumOnly

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 5 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 4 guard(s) constrain the result.

Evidence & Context

Basal area below approx. 2−3 m²/ha of functional native savanna trees is considered critically low.

Metric Definition:

Tree basal area measured as the cross-sectional area of tree stems at breast height per unit of land area.

Benchmark Definition:

Lower critical threshold of tree basal area below which ecosystem function is impaired in grazed tropical monsoonal savannas.

Justification:

Inferred from land condition descriptions and ecological impacts associated with low basal area in grazed savannas.

Sources (1)

Preview of Scenario analysis of alternative vegetation management options on the greenhouse gas budget of two grazing businesses in north-eastern Australia (citing Bray, S.G., Golden, M., and Scanlan, J.C. (2006) Carbon stocks and sequestration potential in woodlands. Final Report for the Australian Greenhouse Office, Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane)
Scenario analysis of alternative vegetation management options on the greenhouse gas budget of two grazing businesses in north-eastern Australia (citing Bray, S.G., Golden, M., and Scanlan, J.C. (2006) Carbon stocks and sequestration potential in woodlands. Final Report for the Australian Greenhouse Office, Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane) Journal

Scenario analysis of alternative vegetation management options on the greenhouse gas budget of two grazing businesses in north-eastern Australia (citing Bray, S.G., Golden, M., and Scanlan, J.C. (2006) Carbon stocks and sequestration potential in woodlands. Final Report for the Australian Greenhouse Office, Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane)

View Source

Supporting Sources (1)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of Do regenerative grazing management practices ... - CSIRO Publishing, accessed May 12, 2025
Do regenerative grazing management practices ... - CSIRO Publishing, accessed May 12, 2025
Contextual Support Journal

Investigating Intensive Grazing Systems in Northern Australia

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Tropical Monsoonal Savannas
  • Land Use Livestock Grazing & Pasture
  • Assessment Conservation Target
  • Vegetation Woodland
  • Evidence Type DegradationThreshold

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 9 Jun 2026

Notes

No upper detrimental threshold — higher values are always better up to natural saturation. Indicates a system where essential ecosystem functions are compromised, often linked to poor land condition and loss of perennial grasses.