Bare Ground

AUS-TDG-FOR-BAR General Moderate confidence

Benchmark Value

No specific value — see range
Range: 0 to 20 %
Optimal Range: 0 to 20
Direction: Lower is desirable ↓
Form: OptimalRange

Scoring Curve

Scoring curve unavailable

The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.

Evidence & Context

An aspirational quantitative target of <10-20% bare ground is recommended for inter-harvest periods in well-managed sites.

Metric Definition:

Bare ground: areas of the soil surface devoid of vegetation, litter, or biological soil crusts, where the mineral soil is directly exposed to atmospheric elements.

Benchmark Definition:

This benchmark represents an aspirational target for bare ground cover in temperate dry woodlands and native grasslands under production forestry during inter-harvest periods, aiming to maintain low bare ground to support ecological health and reduce erosion risk.

Justification:

Derived from conditions in less disturbed temperate woodlands, aiming for high ecological health and low erosion risk.

Sources (2)

Preview of Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. (2012, June). Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of south-eastern Australia. Nationally Threatened Ecological Communities.
Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. (2012, June). Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of south-eastern Australia. Nationally Threatened Ecological Communities. GreyLiterature

Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment. (2012, June). Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) Grassy Woodlands and Derived Native Grasslands of south-eastern Australia. Nationally Threatened Ecological Communities.

View Source
Preview of Gibbons, P., et al. (2010). Benchmark stem densities for forests and woodlands in south-eastern Australia under conditions of relatively little modification by humans since European settlement. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(12), 2125-2133.
Gibbons, P., et al. (2010). Benchmark stem densities for forests and woodlands in south-eastern Australia under conditions of relatively little modification by humans since European settlement. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(12), 2125-2133. GreyLiterature

(PDF) Scientific Assessment of Vegetation Condition Protocols - ResearchGate

View Source

Supporting Sources (6)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of Avon Basin hydrological and nutrient modelling - Government of Western Australia
Avon Basin hydrological and nutrient modelling - Government of Western Australia
Direct Evidence Journal

Cunningham, S. A., et al. (2014). Woodland habitat structures are affected by both agricultural land management and abiotic conditions. Landscape Ecology, 29, 1237-1249.

View Source
Preview of GRASSLANDS - The Nature Conservancy, accessed May 19, 2025,
GRASSLANDS - The Nature Conservancy, accessed May 19, 2025,
Direct Evidence Journal

Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. (2021). Australia State of the Environment 2021: Land.

View Source
Preview of Native Vegetation Integrity Benchmarks: An information sheet
Native Vegetation Integrity Benchmarks: An information sheet
Methodology Source Journal

Geoscience Australia. (2025, April 30). DEA Fractional Cover (Landsat). Digital Earth Australia.

View Source
Preview of New South Wales Vegetation Classification and Assessment: Introduction - Botanic Gardens of Sydney
New South Wales Vegetation Classification and Assessment: Introduction - Botanic Gardens of Sydney
Direct Evidence Journal

Gibbons, P., Briggs, S. V., Murphy, D., Lindenmayer, D. B., McElhinny, C., & Brookhouse, M. (2010). Benchmark stem densities for forests and woodlands in south-eastern Australia under conditions of relatively little modification by humans since European settlement. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(11), 2047-2058.

View Source
Preview of NSW Natural Resources Commission PNF Final Report
NSW Natural Resources Commission PNF Final Report
Methodology Source

Gill, T., et al. (2016). A method for mapping Australian woody vegetation cover by linking continental-scale field data and long-term Landsat time series. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(24), 5848-5870.

View Source
Preview of Stewart, S. B., et al. (2025, March 6). Improved estimates of Australian woody and grass foliage cover from time series of satellite-derived total foliage cover. Biogeosciences, 22(%), 1165-1185.
Stewart, S. B., et al. (2025, March 6). Improved estimates of Australian woody and grass foliage cover from time series of satellite-derived total foliage cover. Biogeosciences, 22(%), 1165-1185.
Contextual Support Journal

Stewart, S. B., et al. (2025, March 6). Improved estimates of Australian woody and grass foliage cover from time series of satellite-derived total foliage cover. Biogeosciences, 22(%), 1165-1185.

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Temperate Dry Woodlands & Native Grasslands
  • Land Use Production Forestry
  • Assessment Not Stated
  • Evidence Type ReferenceCondition

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 9 Jun 2026

Notes

Aspirational target for non-operational areas. AssessmentContext defaulted to 'Not Stated' because the source document did not state one.