Gully Density
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is Point, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
The benchmark of 0 m/ha represents the absence of active, uncontrolled erosional gullies and is derived from the primary objective of leading-practice mine rehabilitation, which is to create a safe, stable, and non-polluting final landform.
Gully Density as the measure of active, uncontrolled erosional gullies per hectare.
This benchmark represents the absence of active, uncontrolled erosional gullies in industrial and infrastructure land use within arid mountain ranges and uplands, indicating a stable and safe landform as targeted by mine rehabilitation practices.
Derived from the principles of geomorphic landform design aiming to prevent accelerated gully erosion.
Sources (1)
MINE REHABILITATION: Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry
View SourceSupporting Sources (22)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
2.10 Surficial Mineral Systems | Geoscience Australia, accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourceAlluvial Gully Erosion Rates and Processes Across the Mitchell River Fluvial Megafan in Northern Queensland, Australia - Resilient Landscapes Hub
View SourceAlluvial gully erosion: an example from the Mitchell fluvial megafan - CORE, accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourceAnnual and decadal variation of sediment yield in Australia, and some global comparisons, accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourceAssessing the long-term geomorphic stability of a rehabilitated landform using the CAESAR-Lisflood landscape evolution model - Australian Centre for Geomechanics, accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourceThe hydrogeomorphic influences on alluvial gully erosion along the Mitchell River fluvial megafan
View SourceAn Approach to Assess Land Stability and Erosion on Mined ..., accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourceAustralia's State of the Forests Report, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceLeading practice guidance on erosion and landform evolution modelling to design post-mining landforms - Queensland Mine Rehabilitation Commissioner, accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourceA Brief History of Mine Rehabilitation Reforms in Queensland, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceApplying erosion and Landscape Evolution Models to assess post-mining landform stability: Technical Paper
View SourceMINE REHABILITATION: Leading Practice Sustainable ..., accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourceBest Practice Erosion and Sediment Control (BPESC) document, accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourcePalaeovalley Groundwater Resources in Arid and Semi-Arid Australia - Geoscience Australia, accessed August 1, 2025,
View SourceAre gullies best for biodiversity? An empirical examination of Australian wet forest types
View SourceReport card on sustainable natural resource use in the rangelands
View SourceRehabilitation effects on gully sediment yields and vegetation in a savanna rangeland - CSIRO Research Publications Repository
View SourceGully erosion prediction across a large region: Murray–Darling Basin, Australia
View SourceBest Practice Erosion and Sediment Control (BPESC) document
View SourceRepairing gully erosion in Western Australia - Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, accessed July 26, 2025
View SourceQueensland government guidelines for managing soil erosion in grazing and cropping lands
View SourceUsing high-resolution topography for spatial prioritisation of gully erosion management across catchments of the Great Barrier Reef, accessed August 1, 2025,
View Source