Water Electrical Conductivity (EC)
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 9 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 8 guard(s) constrain the result.
Evidence & Context
The optimal range for maintaining high ecological integrity in conservation areas is considered to be < 250 µS/cm.
Upper boundary of the optimal management range for electrical conductivity in conservation areas
Conservative upper limit for electrical conductivity to maintain high ecological condition in conservation areas.
Set well below the first biological impact threshold to provide a protective buffer for sensitive species.
Sources (1)
Validating species sensitivity distributions using salinity tolerance of riverine macroinvertebrates in the southern Murray–Darling Basin (Victoria, Australia) - Canadian Science Publishing
View SourceSupporting Sources (4)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
Comparison of two commonly used methods for identifying water quality thresholds in freshwater ecosystems using field and synthetic data - PubMed
View SourceLow water conductivity increases the effects of copper on the serum parameters in fish (Oreochromis niloticus) - PubMed
View SourceThe Effects of Road De-icing Salts on Water Quality and Macroinvertebrates in Australian Alpine Areas - University of Canberra Research Portal
View SourceThe Relationship between Electrical Conductivity and Selected Macroinvertebrate Communities in Four River Systems of South-West Victoria, Australia - ResearchGate
View Source