Invasive Species Presence

AUS-ASC-FOR-ISP General Moderate confidence

Benchmark Value

5 %

Direction: Lower is desirable ↓

Form: Point

Scoring Curve

Scoring curve unavailable

The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is Point, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.

Evidence & Context

"no areas with tree mortality higher than 5%."

Metric Definition:

Percentage of standing timber mortality in a management unit caused by invasive agents.

Benchmark Definition:

This benchmark defines the maximum acceptable percentage of tree mortality caused by invasive agents in plantation forestry to avoid significant ecological harm.

Justification:

Threshold where the impact of invasive pathogens or arthropods causes significant ecological harm.

Sources (1)

WA Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (2009). Forest Health Surveillance Report. Journal

WA Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (2009). Forest Health Surveillance Report.

View Source

Supporting Sources (10)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

DCCEEW (2011). Nomination for feral deer as a key threatening process.

Direct Evidence Journal

DCCEEW (2011). Nomination for feral deer as a key threatening process.

View Source

Ecological assessments for WildCount - TEF

Direct Evidence Government

DCCEEW (2024). Bushfire recovery for wildlife and their habitat - Phase 2 Recovery and Resilience funded projects.

View Source

Frontiers in Forests and Global Change (2020). Non-native Forest Pests in Australia.

Direct Evidence Journal

Frontiers in Forests and Global Change (2020). Non-native Forest Pests in Australia.

View Source

Great Divide Northern Forests (2023–24) Scorecard Report

Direct Evidence Journal

Ecological Health Performance Scorecard report: Great Divide ...

View Source

Motion on recreational hunting and invasive deer management

Regulatory Framework Government

Motion on recreational hunting and invasive deer management

View Source

Murray Region Forestry Hub (2025). Blackberry Strategic Plan and Actions.

Contextual Support GreyLiterature

Murray Region Forestry Hub (2025). Blackberry Strategic Plan and Actions.

View Source

Natural Resources Commission NSW (2022). Insights report - November 2022.

Direct Evidence Journal

Natural Resources Commission NSW (2022). Insights report - November 2022.

View Source

Supporting Communities Manage Pest Animals and Weeds Program - DAFF, accessed July 13, 2025

Regulatory Framework Government

Motion on recreational hunting and invasive deer management in Tasmania - Tasmanian Greens MPs

View Source

Preview of The importance of roads, nutrients, and climate for invasive plant establishment in riparian areas in the northwestern United States | Request PDF - ResearchGate

The importance of roads, nutrients, and climate for invasive plant establishment in riparian areas in the northwestern United States | Request PDF - ResearchGate

Contextual Support Journal

The importance of roads, nutrients, and climate for invasive plant establishment in riparian areas in the northwestern United States | Request PDF - ResearchGate

View Source

Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (2015). Aquatic value identification and risk assessment manual.

Direct Evidence Journal

Victorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (2015). Aquatic value identification and risk assessment manual.

View Source

Context

Region Australia
Biome Alpine and Subalpine Complex
Land Use Production Forestry
Assessment Conservation Target
Evidence Type DegradationThreshold

Lifecycle

Status Active
Version 1
Effective From 10 Jun 2026

Notes

Specifically identifies a threshold for softwood plantation management.

Related Benchmarks

Other benchmarks in the AUS-ASC-FOR-ISP family.