Invasive Species Presence
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is Point, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Evidence & Context
"Littoral rainforest Saplings 58%."
Percentage of saplings showing browse damage or presence markers.
This benchmark represents the percentage of saplings in littoral rainforest showing browse damage or presence markers, indicating a threshold for degradation in conservation target areas within production forestry in the Alpine and Subalpine Complex biome.
Sources (1)
DCCEEW (2011). Nomination for feral deer as a key threatening process.
View SourceSupporting Sources (10)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
DCCEEW (2024). Bushfire recovery for wildlife and their habitat - Phase 2 Recovery and Resilience funded projects.
View SourceFrontiers in Forests and Global Change (2020). Non-native Forest Pests in Australia.
View SourceEcological Health Performance Scorecard report: Great Divide ...
View SourceMotion on recreational hunting and invasive deer management
View SourceMurray Region Forestry Hub (2025). Blackberry Strategic Plan and Actions.
View SourceNatural Resources Commission NSW (2022). Insights report - November 2022.
View SourceMotion on recreational hunting and invasive deer management in Tasmania - Tasmanian Greens MPs
View SourceThe importance of roads, nutrients, and climate for invasive plant establishment in riparian areas in the northwestern United States | Request PDF - ResearchGate
View SourceVictorian Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (2015). Aquatic value identification and risk assessment manual.
View SourceWA Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (2009). Forest Health Surveillance Report.
View Source