Camera Trap Detection Rate
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is Point, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
A production forest in the AWT demonstrating high ecological health would exhibit the following: High Native Fauna CTR: Indicating a vibrant and active native community (e.g., >15 detections per 100 trap-nights).
The Camera Trap Detection Rate (CTR), typically expressed as the number of independent detection events per 100 trap-nights, serves as a widely used index of relative abundance and activity.
Minimum native fauna detection rate indicative of high ecological health in production forests of the Australian Wet Tropics.
Synthesized optimal range characteristic for a healthy production forest in the AWT.
Sources (1)
Supporting Sources (27)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
Site occupancy of select mammals in the tropical forest of Eastern Himalaya - Frontiers, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceCertification - Forestry Corporation, accessed July 20, 2025
View Sourceaccessed January 1, 1970, https
View SourceCAMERA-TRAPPING PAGE 1 - WWF
View SourceAustralian Forest Management Certification | Forest Stewardship Council, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceEcosystem Services - Forest Stewardship Council, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceDetermining the efficacy of camera traps, live capture traps, and detection dogs for locating cryptic small mammal species - PubMed Central, accessed July 20, 2025,
View SourceEcological Integrity Assessment | NatureServe, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceEcological Integrity Assessment Guide - Number Analytics, accessed July 20, 2025,
View SourceEcosystem Services - Forest Stewardship Council, accessed July 20, 2025,
View SourceEcosystem wicks: Woodland trees enhance water infiltration in a fragmented agricultural landscape in eastern Australia, accessed May 15, 2025,
View SourceLarge-scale and long-term wildlife research and monitoring using camera traps: a continental synthesis - ResearchGate, accessed August 6, 2025
View Source(PDF) Range‐Wide Camera Trapping for the Australian Cassowary ..., accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceLaying low: Rugged lowland rainforest preferred by feral cats in the Australian Wet Tropics, accessed July 20, 2025,
View SourceLogging for the ark, accessed July 20, 2025,
View SourceSome established feral animals | Wet Tropics Management Authority, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceLaying low: Rugged lowland rainforest preferred by feral cats in the Australian Wet Tropics, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceDetermining the efficacy of camera traps, live capture traps, and detection dogs for locating cryptic small mammal species - PubMed Central, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceCamera trapping in ecology: A new section for wildlife research - PMC, accessed August 6, 2025
View SourceCAMERA-TRAPPING PAGE 1 - WWF, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceSome established feral animals | Wet Tropics Management Authority, accessed July 20, 2025,
View SourceLarge-scale and long-term wildlife research and monitoring using camera traps: a continental synthesis - ResearchGate, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceBorchard: Using camera – trap data to model habitat use by ..., accessed August 6, 2025
View SourceWet Tropics of Queensland - UNESCO World Heritage Centre, accessed July 23, 2025
View SourceMiconia calvescens, accessed July 22, 2025,
View SourceWildlife Monitoring in Managed Forests: Adapting for Conservation - SciTechnol, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceWildObs | TERN Australia - Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
View Source