Water Electrical Conductivity (EC)
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 13 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 12 guard(s) constrain the result.
Evidence & Context
Significant detrimental impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem function becoming increasingly evident as EC approaches and exceeds 350 µS/cm.
Upper detrimental ecological threshold for Water Electrical Conductivity (EC) indicating significant ecosystem degradation.
This benchmark indicates a high EC threshold where significant ecological harm and degradation occur.
Based on Waterwatch CHIP 'Poor' category and ecological studies showing loss of sensitive species and impaired function above this level.
Sources (2)
Percentage compliance with ANZECC water quality trigger values for aquatic ecosystems, primary contact recreation and secondary
View SourceANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Guidelines
View SourceSupporting Sources (4)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
Managing farm water supplies - Agriculture Victoria
View SourceUsing the ANZECC Guidelines and Water Quality Objectives in NSW
View SourceSalinity | Murray–Darling Basin Authority
View Source