eDNA Biodiversity Detection

AUS-AIF-LVG-DNA General Moderate confidence

Benchmark Value

5 count
Thresholds: Lower: 5, Upper: —
Direction: Higher is desirable ↑
Form: LowerThreshold

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 2 benchmarks together — the Point form drives the primary score, while 1 guard(s) constrain the result.

Evidence & Context

The degraded site shows a stark reduction in native species richness (from 16 to 5) and a community dominated by invasive species (4 detected).

Metric Definition:

Lower critical threshold of native vertebrate species richness indicating ecosystem degradation.

Benchmark Definition:

This benchmark defines the lower critical threshold of native vertebrate species richness below which the ecosystem is considered degraded in the target biome under livestock grazing land use.

Justification:

The lower threshold is based on the comparison between a high-integrity benchmark site and a degraded exemplar site, showing a significant drop in native species richness and increase in invasive species.

Sources (1)

Preview of Results — Great Australian Wildlife Search
Results — Great Australian Wildlife Search GreyLiterature

Great Australian Wildlife Search - Biodiversity Findings Report Spring 2023

View Source

Supporting Sources (4)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of Can eDNA be an indicator of tree groundwater use? A perspective - CSIRO Publishing
Can eDNA be an indicator of tree groundwater use? A perspective - CSIRO Publishing
Contextual Support Journal

Revolutionising environmental monitoring using eDNA - CSIRO

View Source
Preview of eDNA explained: unlocking nature's hidden biodiversity - CSIRO, accessed August 12, 2025
eDNA explained: unlocking nature's hidden biodiversity - CSIRO, accessed August 12, 2025
Contextual Support Government

eDNA explained: unlocking nature's hidden biodiversity - CSIRO

View Source
Preview of Environmental DNA provides higher resolution assessment of riverine biodiversity and ecosystem function via spatio-temporal nestedness and turnover partitioning
Environmental DNA provides higher resolution assessment of riverine biodiversity and ecosystem function via spatio-temporal nestedness and turnover partitioning
Methodology Source Journal

Environmental DNA provides higher resolution assessment of riverine biodiversity and ecosystem function via spatio-temporal nestedness and turnover partitioning

View Source
Preview of The Great Australian Wildlife Search: Biodiversity Findings Report Spring 2024
The Great Australian Wildlife Search: Biodiversity Findings Report Spring 2024
Direct Evidence Journal

eDNA results from the Great Australian Wildlife Search | MurrayDarling Basin Authority

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Arid Inland Floodplains & Ephemeral River Systems
  • Land Use Livestock Grazing & Pasture
  • Assessment Conservation Target
  • Evidence Type DegradationThreshold

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 23 Mar 2026

Notes

This threshold is characterized by a depauperate native fauna, absence of sensitive native species, dominance of tolerant generalists, and significant presence of invasive species such as European Carp. No upper detrimental threshold — higher values are always better up to natural saturation.

Related Benchmarks

Other benchmarks in the AUS-AIF-LVG-DNA family.