Soil Water Infiltration Rate

AUS-TMI-FOR-SWI General Moderate confidence

Benchmark Value

30 mm/hr
Direction: Higher is desirable ↑
Form: MinimumOnly

Scoring Curve

Scoring curve unavailable

The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.

Evidence & Context

A lower critical threshold of <30 mm/hr is proposed. Evidence from multiple land use contexts demonstrates that when infiltration rates fall below this level, typically due to soil compaction from machinery, the soil's hydrological function is severely compromised.

Metric Definition:

Soil water infiltration rate below which soil is considered hydrologically dysfunctional due to compaction.

Benchmark Definition:

This benchmark defines the minimum soil water infiltration rate below which soil hydrological function is severely impaired due to compaction, indicating a critical threshold for soil health in production forestry.

Justification:

Based on converging evidence from multiple land use contexts showing severe hydrological impairment below this rate.

Sources (1)

Preview of Gregory, J. H., et al. (2006). Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 61(3), 117-124.
Gregory, J. H., et al. (2006). Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 61(3), 117-124. Journal

Gregory, J. H., et al. (2006). Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 61(3), 117-124.

View Source

Supporting Sources (4)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of Early response of soil properties and function to riparian rainforest restoration - Lake Baroon Catchment Care Group, accessed July 18, 2025,
Early response of soil properties and function to riparian rainforest restoration - Lake Baroon Catchment Care Group, accessed July 18, 2025,
Direct Evidence GreyLiterature

Ecology of Nitrogen Fixing, Nitrifying, and Denitrifying ...

View Source
Preview of Gageler, R., et al. (2014). Restoring soil carbon, nitrogen and functionality in an Australian tropical catchment: a chronosequence approach. PLOS ONE, 9(8), e104198.
Gageler, R., et al. (2014). Restoring soil carbon, nitrogen and functionality in an Australian tropical catchment: a chronosequence approach. PLOS ONE, 9(8), e104198.
Contextual Support Journal

Early Response of Soil Properties and Function to Riparian Rainforest Restoration - PMC

View Source
Preview of NSW Local Land Services. (2021). Healthy soils and water infiltration in the paddock.
NSW Local Land Services. (2021). Healthy soils and water infiltration in the paddock.
Direct Evidence

NSW Local Land Services. (2021). Healthy soils and water infiltration in the paddock.

View Source
Preview of USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Soil Quality Indicators: Infiltration.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. (n.d.). Soil Quality Indicators: Infiltration.
Contextual Support Journal

Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS)

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Tropical & Subtropical Maritime Islands
  • Land Use Production Forestry
  • Assessment Not Stated
  • Evidence Type DegradationThreshold

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 5 Jun 2026

Notes

Below 30 mm/hr, soil is considered hydrologically dysfunctional due to compaction, leading to significant runoff and erosion. AssessmentContext defaulted to 'Not Stated' because the source document did not state one.