Basal Area — Benchmark Detail

Benchmark Value

10 m²/ha

Direction: Higher is desirable ↑

Form: MaximumOnly

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 19 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 18 guard(s) constrain the result.

Contributing Benchmarks

OptimalRange Primary Point Guard MaximumOnly Guard MinimumOnly Guard OptimalRange Guard OptimalRange Guard MaximumOnly Guard MaximumOnly Guard MinimumOnly Guard MaximumOnly Guard OptimalRange Guard MinimumOnly Guard MaximumOnly Guard OptimalRange Guard MinimumOnly Guard Point Guard MinimumOnly Guard MaximumOnly Guard OptimalRange Guard

Evidence & Context

A Basal Area of greater than 10.0 m²/ha is proposed as this upper detrimental threshold.

Metric Definition:

Basal Area (m²/ha) as a measure of woody vegetation structure

Benchmark Definition:

This is the upper detrimental threshold of Basal Area above which agronomic failure occurs due to competition in arid shrublands under agricultural crop production.

Justification:

Inferred from agroforestry research showing severe competition effects on crop yields at high Basal Area.

Sources (10)

ARS Broome 2023 - EventsAir

ARS Broome 2023 - EventsAir

View Source

Preview of Australia state of the environment 2021: land, accessed May 11, 2025

Australia state of the environment 2021: land, accessed May 11, 2025 Journal

Buffel grass in Queensland's semi-arid woodlands - CSIRO Publishing, accessed July 13, 2025

View Source

Preview of Australia's Native Vegetation Framework - DAFF, accessed August 6, 2025,

Australia's Native Vegetation Framework - DAFF, accessed August 6, 2025, Journal

risks and impacts of plant industries on soil condition - Department of Agriculture and Fisheries

View Source

Biodiversity - Environment and Heritage, accessed July 8, 2025

Australia state of the environment 2021: land

View Source

BIODIVERSITY - EPA, South Australia Journal

BIODIVERSITY - EPA, South Australia

View Source

Description of Ecological Communities: Arid Eucalypt Woodlands - NEC 1.8 to 1.13 - DCCEEW, accessed July 23, 2025 Journal

Description of Ecological Communities: Arid Eucalypt Woodlands - NEC 1.8 to 1.13 - DCCEEW

View Source

Preview of Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural ...

Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural ... Journal

Does grazing exclusion in Australia's rangelands affect biomass and debris carbon stocks? - CSIRO Publishing, accessed April 29, 2025,

View Source

Productivity of Mallee Agroforestry Systems - — The ... - DBCA Library Journal

Productivity of Mallee Agroforestry Systems - — The ... - DBCA Library

View Source

Preview of Quantifying vegetation and canopy structural complexity from terrestrial LiDAR data using the forestr R package | Request PDF - ResearchGate

Quantifying vegetation and canopy structural complexity from terrestrial LiDAR data using the forestr R package | Request PDF - ResearchGate Journal

Quantifying vegetation and canopy structural complexity from terrestrial LiDAR data using the forestr R package | Request PDF - ResearchGate

View Source

Preview of The Rangeland Journal - CSIRO PUBLISHING, accessed July 6, 2025,

The Rangeland Journal - CSIRO PUBLISHING, accessed July 6, 2025, Journal

Does grazing exclusion in Australia's rangelands affect biomass and debris carbon stocks? - CSIRO Publishing

View Source

Context

Region Australia
Biome Arid Shrublands & Stony Plains
Land Use Agricultural Crop Production
Assessment Not Stated
Evidence Type DegradationThreshold

Lifecycle

Status Active
Version 1
Effective From 7 Jun 2026

Notes

Above this level, competition for water likely causes significant crop failure, rendering the integrated agroecosystem non-functional. AssessmentContext defaulted to 'Not Stated' because the source document did not state one.

Related Benchmarks

Other benchmarks in the AUS-ASP-AGR-BAS family.