Water Electrical Conductivity (EC)

AUS-AMR-LVG-WEC General Moderate confidence

Benchmark Value

1500 µS/cm
Direction: Lower is desirable ↓
Form: MaximumOnly

Scoring Curve

Scoring curve unavailable

The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.

Evidence & Context

Broad-scale adverse effects on aquatic biota begin to occur as salinity exceeds 1,000 mg/L TDS, which corresponds to an EC of approximately 1,500 µS/cm.

Metric Definition:

Water Electrical Conductivity (EC)

Benchmark Definition:

This benchmark represents the upper electrical conductivity limit above which broad-scale adverse effects on aquatic biota begin to occur in Australian Arid Mountain Range water bodies.

Justification:

This threshold is based on a comprehensive review of the effects of increasing salinity on Australian freshwater ecosystems indicating the onset of broad-scale stress across multiple taxonomic groups.

Sources (1)

Preview of (PDF) Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in ...
(PDF) Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in ... Journal

(PDF) Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in ...

View Source

Supporting Sources (5)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines - Water Quality Australia, accessed August 12, 2025
ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines - Water Quality Australia, accessed August 12, 2025
Contextual Support Government

ANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines - Water Quality Australia

View Source
Preview of NATIONAL PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES FOR RANGELAND MANAGEMENT, accessed August 2, 2025,
NATIONAL PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES FOR RANGELAND MANAGEMENT, accessed August 2, 2025,
Contextual Support Journal

Water Quality for Livestock and Poultry - Water quality for agriculture

View Source
Preview of Variation of water quality parameters with location in the two known habitats of Mogurnda clivicola (Flinders Ranges Mogurnda) and the implications for the ongoing viability of those habitats
Variation of water quality parameters with location in the two known habitats of Mogurnda clivicola (Flinders Ranges Mogurnda) and the implications for the ongoing viability of those habitats
Contextual Support Journal

Variation of water quality parameters with location in the two known habitats of Mogurnda clivicola (Flinders Ranges Mogurnda) and the implications for the ongoing viability of those habitats

View Source
Preview of Water Quality and the Grazing Animal - UNL Digital Commons, accessed July 25, 2025
Water Quality and the Grazing Animal - UNL Digital Commons, accessed July 25, 2025
Contextual Support

Water Quality and the Grazing Animal - UNL Digital Commons

View Source
Preview of Water quality for livestock, accessed July 29, 2025,
Water quality for livestock, accessed July 29, 2025,
Contextual Support Journal

Managing Grazing to Restore Soil Health, Ecosystem Function, and Ecosystem Services - Frontiers, accessed July 10, 2025,

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Arid Mountain Ranges & Uplands
  • Land Use Livestock Grazing & Pasture
  • Assessment Not Stated
  • Evidence Type DegradationThreshold

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 9 Jun 2026

Notes

This value serves as a critical upper boundary for management aiming to protect overall aquatic biodiversity, distinct from the higher tolerances of a few highly adapted species or livestock. AssessmentContext defaulted to 'Not Stated' because the source document did not state one.

Related Benchmarks

Other benchmarks in the AUS-AMR-LVG-WEC family.