Litter Cover
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is Point, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Evidence & Context
Riparian Shrubland (EVC 19) follows with a benchmark of 40%
Percent cover of organic litter.
Reference benchmark for undisturbed riparian shrubland.
Sources (1)
Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP). (2020). Victorian Alps Bioregion EVC Benchmarks.
View SourceSupporting Sources (13)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
short-term review
View SourceGoulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority (GBCMA). (2011). Assessment of Habitat Quality: Subalpine.
View SourceGelliondale Flora and Fauna Report
View SourceVictorian Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE). (2004). Ecological Vegetation Class (EVC) Bioregion Benchmark - East Gippsland Uplands Bioregion: EVC 206 Sub-alpine Grassland.
View SourceHolmquist, J. G., Schmidt-Gengenbach, J., & Haultain, S. A. (2013). Effects of a Long-Term Disturbance on Arthropods and Vegetation in Subalpine Wetlands. PLOS ONE, 8(1).
View SourceSomerville, M. et al. (2019). Function attribute benchmarks for the Biodiversity Assessment Method. NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.
View SourceDepartment of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania. (2022). SHS Subalpine heathland: closed heathland facies.
View SourceTasmanian Government. (2023). Hearing Submission R15: Stephen Bartels.
View SourceBiosis and GHD. (2016). Flora and Fauna Assessment: Mount Buller Water Storage Project.
View SourceDepartment of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania. (2022). SSW Western subalpine scrub: Banksia marginata facies.
View SourceWorleyParsons. (2011). Australian Alps Catchment Condition Report.
View Source