Litter Cover
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context.
Evidence & Context
The optimal range is between 20% and 40%.
Visual estimation of litter cover.
Healthy subalpine woodlands in the Australian Alpine and Subalpine Complex typically have organic litter cover between 20% and 40%.
Real-world measurements in healthy, well-managed sites often record values between 20% and 40%.
Sources (1)
Biosis and GHD. (2016). Flora and Fauna Assessment: Mount Buller Water Storage Project.
View SourceSupporting Sources (13)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
short-term review
View SourceGoulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority (GBCMA). (2011). Assessment of Habitat Quality: Subalpine.
View SourceDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP). (2020). Victorian Alps Bioregion EVC Benchmarks.
View SourceGelliondale Flora and Fauna Report
View SourceNative Vegetation Integrity Benchmarks - Environment and Heritage, accessed April 6, 2026
View SourceHolmquist, J. G., Schmidt-Gengenbach, J., & Haultain, S. A. (2013). Effects of a Long-Term Disturbance on Arthropods and Vegetation in Subalpine Wetlands. PLOS ONE, 8(1).
View SourceSomerville, M. et al. (2019). Function attribute benchmarks for the Biodiversity Assessment Method. NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.
View SourceDepartment of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania. (2022). SHS Subalpine heathland: closed heathland facies.
View SourceTasmanian Government. (2023). Hearing Submission R15: Stephen Bartels.
View SourceDepartment of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania. (2022). SSW Western subalpine scrub: Banksia marginata facies.
View SourceWorleyParsons. (2011). Australian Alps Catchment Condition Report.
View Source