Litter Cover
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is Point, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Evidence & Context
Subalpine heathland (SHS), characterized by closed heathland facies on well-drained fertile sites, has a benchmark for organic litter cover of 10%.
Percent cover of organic litter.
Benchmark for health in Tasmanian subalpine heathland.
Sources (1)
Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania. (2022). SHS Subalpine heathland: closed heathland facies.
View SourceSupporting Sources (13)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
short-term review
View SourceGoulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority (GBCMA). (2011). Assessment of Habitat Quality: Subalpine.
View SourceDepartment of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP). (2020). Victorian Alps Bioregion EVC Benchmarks.
View SourceGelliondale Flora and Fauna Report
View SourceNative Vegetation Integrity Benchmarks - Environment and Heritage, accessed April 6, 2026
View SourceHolmquist, J. G., Schmidt-Gengenbach, J., & Haultain, S. A. (2013). Effects of a Long-Term Disturbance on Arthropods and Vegetation in Subalpine Wetlands. PLOS ONE, 8(1).
View SourceSomerville, M. et al. (2019). Function attribute benchmarks for the Biodiversity Assessment Method. NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.
View SourceTasmanian Government. (2023). Hearing Submission R15: Stephen Bartels.
View SourceBiosis and GHD. (2016). Flora and Fauna Assessment: Mount Buller Water Storage Project.
View SourceDepartment of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania. (2022). SSW Western subalpine scrub: Banksia marginata facies.
View SourceWorleyParsons. (2011). Australian Alps Catchment Condition Report.
View Source