Water Electrical Conductivity (EC)
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
A biologically-defined upper detrimental threshold for aquatic ecosystem health exists at approximately 1600 µS/cm.
Electrical Conductivity (EC) level at which aquatic ecosystem health is detrimentally affected.
The Electrical Conductivity (EC) level above which aquatic ecosystems in temperate semi-arid shrublands and open woodlands under industrial use are considered ecologically stressed.
Based on biological evidence from sensitive indicator species like diatoms.
Sources (1)
Validating species sensitivity distributions using salinity tolerance of riverine macroinvertebrates in the southern Murray–Darling Basin (Victoria, Australia) - Canadian Science Publishing
View SourceSupporting Sources (19)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
Shifting Goalposts: Setting Restoration Targets for Waterbirds in the Murray-Darling Basin Under Climate Change - Frontiers, accessed July 9, 2025
View Source(PDF) Water resources management and mining industry in arid and semi-arid regions - ResearchGate
View SourceAustralian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality
View SourceNorthern Territory Government (2020) Darwin Harbour Region Water Quality Objectives, Report Card Section 3.0.
View SourceANZECC & ARMCANZ (2000) guidelines - Water Quality Australia
View SourceA systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration - PubMed Central, accessed July 20, 2025
View SourceDELUGE AND DROUGHT: AUSTRALIA'S WATER SECURITY IN A CHANGING CLIMATE
View SourceWater Quality Guidelines Home - Water Quality Australia
View SourceGuideline for Salinity Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Using Nuclear and Related Techniques - OAPEN Library
View SourceMining and urban impacts on semi-arid freshwater aquatic systems: the example of Mount Isa, Queensland - Macquarie University Research Portal
View SourceSalinity | Murray–Darling Basin Authority
View SourceSoil Mapping Using Electromagnetic Induction to Assess the Suitability of Land for Growing Leptospermum nitens in Western Australia - Frontiers, accessed August 9, 2025
View SourceWater Quality Protection Guideline No. 11: Mine dewatering
View SourceSalinity Management in the Murray2Darling Basin, Australia - MDPI, accessed July 28, 2025
View SourceSurface Water Supply in the Western Australian Goldfields - Fact or Fiction? - AusIMM
View SourceAustralian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000)
View SourceWater Quality Protection Guideline No. 11 - Government of Western Australia
View SourceAssessment of Impacts of Coal Mining in the Region of Sydney, Australia on the Aquatic Environment Using Macroinvertebrates and Chlorophyll as Indicators
View SourceWorkshop - on Environmental Management - GEMG
View Source