Water Electrical Conductivity (EC)
Benchmark Value
Scoring Curve
The scoring engine could not generate a curve for this benchmark context. The primary form is CompositeFramework, but the benchmark data may be missing required fields (e.g., optimal range bounds for an OptimalRange benchmark). This is typically a data quality issue in the benchmark pipeline.
Contributing Benchmarks
Evidence & Context
The ANZECC (2000) guidelines provide a default trigger value range for electrical conductivity in upland rivers of 30–350 µS/cm.
Electrical Conductivity (EC) range indicative of low risk to aquatic ecosystems in upland rivers.
This benchmark defines a conservative range of electrical conductivity values in upland rivers that indicate good water quality and low risk to aquatic ecosystems.
Nationally endorsed guideline values for minimally disturbed upland river systems.
Supporting Sources (27)
Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.
(PDF) Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in Australia
View Source(PDF) Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in Australia - ResearchGate
View SourceGeophysics foundations: Physical properties: Electrical resistivity of geologic materials - UBC EOAS, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourcePercentage compliance with ANZECC water quality trigger values for aquatic ecosystems, primary contact recreation and secondary
View SourceNamoi River Water Quality Objectives explained - NSW Government
View SourceEstablishing closure targets for discharge to temporary waters — a review - Australian Centre for Geomechanics
View SourceAquatic ecosystems in post-mining landscapes: Technical paper, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourceAssessing discharges from a uranium mine 64 case study - Water Quality Australia, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourceNorthern Territory Government (2020) Darwin Harbour Region Water Quality Objectives, Report Card Section 3.0.
View SourceCentral Pilbara Water Resource Management Plan - EPA WA, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourceWater Quality objectives for the region - Department of Lands, Planning and Environment
View SourceEnvironmental impacts of uranium mining in Australia, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourceEstablishing closure targets for discharge to temporary waters 64 a review - Australian Centre for Geomechanics, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourceGuidelines for the management of water in mines and quarries - Resources Victoria
View SourceSalinity as a major influence on groundwater microbial communities in agricultural landscapes - CSIRO Publishing, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourceWater - BHP, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourceQuantifying Health in Ephemeral Rivers - eWater
View SourceRegulatory Statement: Monitoring of Electrical Conductivity in the Beetaloo Sub 2basin, accessed August 1, 2025
View SourceRevised Ranger Mine Water Quality Objectives for Magela Creek and Gulungul Creek
View SourceWildlife Research - CSIRO PUBLISHING, accessed July 30, 2025
View SourceThe Phosphorus Buffering Index – What Does it Mean for Your Soil? - Summit Fertilizers
View SourceThe Relationship between Electrical Conductivity and Selected Macroinvertebrate Communities in Four River Systems of South-West Victoria, Australia - ResearchGate
View SourceAustralian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality (2000)
View SourceConservation Advice for the Karst springs and associated alkaline fens of the Naracoorte Coastal Plain Bioregion, accessed July 27, 2025
View SourceSeasonal changes in water quality and macrophytes and the ...
View SourceWater Quality Protection Guidelines No. 6 - Government of Western Australia, accessed August 1, 2025
View Source14-Month Water Quality Investigation of Coal Mine Discharge on Two Rivers in NSW, Australia: Implications for Environmental Regulation - ResearchGate, accessed August 1, 2025
View Source