Soil Water Infiltration Rate

AUS-TDG-AGR-SWI General Moderate confidence

Benchmark Value

No specific value — see range
Range: 50 to 70 mm/hr
Optimal Range: 50 to 70
Direction: Higher is desirable ↑
Form: OptimalRange

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context. The scoring engine uses 11 benchmarks together — the OptimalRange form drives the primary score, while 10 guard(s) constrain the result.

Evidence & Context

Based on available data and an understanding of soil processes under regenerative management, a Reference Value range of 50 - 70 mm/hr is proposed for SWIR, with the potential for rates to be even higher (e.g., >100 mm/hr) under optimal soil conditions and management within this land use and biome.

Metric Definition:

Soil Water Infiltration Rate (SWIR) is the soil's capacity to absorb and transmit water from the surface through the soil profile.

Benchmark Definition:

This benchmark defines the typical soil water infiltration rate range of 50 to 70 mm/hr achievable under regenerative agricultural management in temperate dry woodlands and native grasslands of Australia, indicating good soil hydrological function.

Justification:

This proposed range is primarily derived from field observations of well-structured soils under agricultural management in relevant Australian temperate regions, often within the wheatbelt, which serve as a robust proxy for the 'best available condition' achievable through sustained best-practice sustainable or regenerative agriculture.

Sources (3)

Preview of Effects of crop and pasture rotations and surface cover on rainfall infiltration on a Kandosol in south-west Queensland - ResearchGate
Effects of crop and pasture rotations and surface cover on rainfall infiltration on a Kandosol in south-west Queensland - ResearchGate

Effects of crop and pasture rotations and surface cover on rainfall infiltration on a Kandosol in south-west Queensland - ResearchGate

View Source
Preview of Healthy soils and water infiltration in the paddock - Local Land Services - NSW Government
Healthy soils and water infiltration in the paddock - Local Land Services - NSW Government Government

Healthy soils and water infiltration in the paddock - Local Land Services - NSW Government

View Source
Preview of Soil Health AssessmentGuide - Soils For Life
Soil Health AssessmentGuide - Soils For Life

Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis

View Source

Supporting Sources (2)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of Farming for the future: optimising soil health for a sustainable future in Australian broadacre cropping - Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC)
Farming for the future: optimising soil health for a sustainable future in Australian broadacre cropping - Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC)
Contextual Support

Farming for the future: optimising soil health for a sustainable future in Australian broadacre cropping - Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC)

View Source
Preview of Soil Structural Decline - Can the Trend be Reversed? - Agronomy Australia Proceedings
Soil Structural Decline - Can the Trend be Reversed? - Agronomy Australia Proceedings
Contextual Support GreyLiterature

Soil Structural Decline - Can the Trend be Reversed? - Agronomy Australia Proceedings

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Temperate Dry Woodlands & Native Grasslands
  • Land Use Agricultural Crop Production
  • Assessment Not Stated
  • Evidence Type ReferenceCondition

Lifecycle

  • Status Superseded
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 10 Jun 2026
  • Effective To 10 Jun 2026

Notes

The benchmark range of 50-70 mm/hr, with potential for higher rates, represents a high level of soil hydrological function achievable through regenerative practices. Rates >100 mm/hr are possible under optimal conditions. AssessmentContext defaulted to 'Not Stated' because the source document did not state one.