Vegetation Extent

AUS-TDG-LVG-VEX General High confidence

Benchmark Value

70 %

Direction: Higher is desirable ↑

Form: MinimumOnly

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context.

Evidence & Context

These principles included: maintenance of a perennial tussock grass structure across the landscape (70% minimum for pasture area)

Metric Definition:

Minimum percent of pasture area maintained as native perennial tussock grass structure.

Benchmark Definition:

Management target for retaining grassy layer integrity under livestock grazing.

Justification:

Direct management target for retaining grassy layer integrity under livestock grazing in eastern Australia.

Sources (1)

Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands Journal

Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands

View Source

Supporting Sources (7)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Adaptive Management Guidelines for Box Gum Grassy Woodlands

Direct Evidence Journal

Box-Gum Grassy Woodland Adaptive Management

View Source

Effects of Stock Grazing on Biodiversity Values in ... - ACT Government, accessed August 4, 2025

Direct Evidence Journal

Effects of stock grazing on biodiversity values in temperate native grassland and grassy woodlands in SE Australia: A Literature Review

View Source

Environmental Protection Works Guideline on Rural Regulated Land Sustainable Grazing Allowable Activity, accessed July 10, 2025

Direct Evidence

Using the sustainable grazing allowable activity

View Source

Environmental Stewardship - Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project - Information Booklet - DCCEEW, accessed August 12, 2025,

Direct Evidence Journal

Environmental Stewardship Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project

View Source

Preview of Fischer, J., et al. (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10/20/40/30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 35-45.

Fischer, J., et al. (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10/20/40/30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 35-45.

Direct Evidence

Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10:20:40:30 guidelines

View Source

Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains

Irrelevant

Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains

View Source

Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm

Direct Evidence Journal

Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm

View Source

Vegetation Extent

Benchmark Value

Scoring Curve

Evidence & Context

Sources (1)

Supporting Sources (7)

Context

Lifecycle

Notes

Related Benchmarks