Vegetation Extent

AUS-TDG-LVG-VEX General High confidence

Benchmark Value

80 %

Direction: Higher is desirable ↑

Form: MinimumOnly

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context.

Evidence & Context

Maintain a minimum of 80% groundcover at all times and biomass not less than 2200kg/h.

Metric Definition:

Minimum groundcover percentage of native herbaceous vegetation to preserve biodiversity and soil protection.

Benchmark Definition:

Minimum groundcover target to maintain biodiversity and soil protection in Box-Gum woodlands.

Justification:

Explicit target to maintain diversity and prevent soil loss in high-condition Box-Gum woodlands under grazing.

Sources (1)

Preview of Adaptive Management Guidelines for Box Gum Grassy Woodlands

Adaptive Management Guidelines for Box Gum Grassy Woodlands Journal

Box-Gum Grassy Woodland Adaptive Management

View Source

Supporting Sources (7)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Effects of Stock Grazing on Biodiversity Values in ... - ACT Government, accessed August 4, 2025

Direct Evidence Journal

Effects of stock grazing on biodiversity values in temperate native grassland and grassy woodlands in SE Australia: A Literature Review

View Source

Environmental Protection Works Guideline on Rural Regulated Land Sustainable Grazing Allowable Activity, accessed July 10, 2025

Direct Evidence

Using the sustainable grazing allowable activity

View Source

Environmental Stewardship - Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project - Information Booklet - DCCEEW, accessed August 12, 2025,

Direct Evidence Journal

Environmental Stewardship Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project

View Source

Preview of Fischer, J., et al. (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10/20/40/30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 35-45.

Fischer, J., et al. (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10/20/40/30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 35-45.

Direct Evidence

Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10:20:40:30 guidelines

View Source

Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains

Irrelevant

Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains

View Source

Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands

Contextual Support Journal

Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands

View Source

Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm

Direct Evidence Journal

Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm

View Source

Vegetation Extent

Benchmark Value

Scoring Curve

Evidence & Context

Sources (1)

Supporting Sources (7)

Context

Lifecycle

Notes

Related Benchmarks