Vegetation Extent

AUS-TDG-LVG-VEX General High confidence

Benchmark Value

10 %
Direction: Higher is desirable ↑
Form: MinimumOnly

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context.

Evidence & Context

Similarly, Radford et al. (2005) recommended the retention of at least 10% native vegetation in the landscape to maintain bird species diversity.

Metric Definition:

Total landscape-scale native vegetation cover required to support biodiversity.

Benchmark Definition:

Minimum native vegetation cover to maintain bird species diversity in the landscape.

Justification:

Key regional threshold identified for fauna persistence in fragmented woodland-grassland zones.

Sources (1)

Preview of Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains
Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains

Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains

View Source

Supporting Sources (7)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of Adaptive Management Guidelines for Box Gum Grassy Woodlands
Adaptive Management Guidelines for Box Gum Grassy Woodlands
Direct Evidence Journal

Box-Gum Grassy Woodland Adaptive Management

View Source
Preview of Effects of Stock Grazing on Biodiversity Values in ... - ACT Government, accessed August 4, 2025
Effects of Stock Grazing on Biodiversity Values in ... - ACT Government, accessed August 4, 2025
Direct Evidence Journal

Effects of stock grazing on biodiversity values in temperate native grassland and grassy woodlands in SE Australia: A Literature Review

View Source
Preview of Environmental Protection Works Guideline on Rural Regulated Land Sustainable Grazing Allowable Activity, accessed July 10, 2025
Environmental Protection Works Guideline on Rural Regulated Land Sustainable Grazing Allowable Activity, accessed July 10, 2025
Direct Evidence

Using the sustainable grazing allowable activity

View Source
Preview of Environmental Stewardship - Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project - Information Booklet - DCCEEW, accessed August 12, 2025,
Environmental Stewardship - Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project - Information Booklet - DCCEEW, accessed August 12, 2025,
Direct Evidence Journal

Environmental Stewardship Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project

View Source
Preview of Fischer, J., et al. (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10/20/40/30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 35-45.
Fischer, J., et al. (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10/20/40/30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 35-45.
Direct Evidence

Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10:20:40:30 guidelines

View Source
Preview of Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands
Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands
Contextual Support Journal

Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands

View Source
Preview of Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm
Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm
Direct Evidence Journal

Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Temperate Dry Woodlands & Native Grasslands
  • Land Use Livestock Grazing & Pasture
  • Assessment Conservation Target
  • Evidence Type ReferenceCondition

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 10 Jul 2026

Notes

Highlights landscape-scale context importance over single patch sizes.