Vegetation Extent

AUS-TDG-LVG-VEX General High confidence

Benchmark Value

30 %
Direction: Higher is desirable ↑
Form: MinimumOnly

Scoring Curve

This curve shows how a field measurement for this indicator would score across all available benchmark forms in this context.

Evidence & Context

minimum levels of tree cover across the landscape (30% minimum woodland structure)

Metric Definition:

Minimum tree/woody vegetation cover required to maintain a viable woodland landscape.

Benchmark Definition:

Tipping point for landscape-scale tree retention in grassy eucalypt woodlands.

Justification:

Identifies the tipping point for landscape-scale tree retention in grassy eucalypt woodlands.

Sources (1)

Preview of Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands
Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands Journal

Managing and Conserving Grassy Woodlands

View Source

Supporting Sources (7)

Additional references from the underlying research that informed this benchmark.

Preview of Adaptive Management Guidelines for Box Gum Grassy Woodlands
Adaptive Management Guidelines for Box Gum Grassy Woodlands
Direct Evidence Journal

Box-Gum Grassy Woodland Adaptive Management

View Source
Preview of Effects of Stock Grazing on Biodiversity Values in ... - ACT Government, accessed August 4, 2025
Effects of Stock Grazing on Biodiversity Values in ... - ACT Government, accessed August 4, 2025
Direct Evidence Journal

Effects of stock grazing on biodiversity values in temperate native grassland and grassy woodlands in SE Australia: A Literature Review

View Source
Preview of Environmental Protection Works Guideline on Rural Regulated Land Sustainable Grazing Allowable Activity, accessed July 10, 2025
Environmental Protection Works Guideline on Rural Regulated Land Sustainable Grazing Allowable Activity, accessed July 10, 2025
Direct Evidence

Using the sustainable grazing allowable activity

View Source
Preview of Environmental Stewardship - Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project - Information Booklet - DCCEEW, accessed August 12, 2025,
Environmental Stewardship - Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project - Information Booklet - DCCEEW, accessed August 12, 2025,
Direct Evidence Journal

Environmental Stewardship Box Gum Grassy Woodland Project

View Source
Preview of Fischer, J., et al. (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10/20/40/30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 35-45.
Fischer, J., et al. (2013). Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10/20/40/30 guidelines. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 166, 35-45.
Direct Evidence

Maximizing retention of native biodiversity in Australian agricultural landscapes—The 10:20:40:30 guidelines

View Source
Preview of Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains
Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains
Irrelevant

Food for thought: biodiversity management on farms - links to demand-driven value chains

View Source
Preview of Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm
Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm
Direct Evidence Journal

Shelterbelts: a guide to improving natural assets on a farm

View Source

Context

  • Region Australia
  • Biome Temperate Dry Woodlands & Native Grasslands
  • Land Use Livestock Grazing & Pasture
  • Assessment Agricultural Biodiversity Target
  • Vegetation Woodland
  • Evidence Type HealthyOperationalRange

Lifecycle

  • Status Active
  • Version 1
  • Effective From 10 Jul 2026

Notes

Evaluated via the Grazed Landscapes Management Project.